Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Chemistry. Biology. Ecology

ISSN 1816-9775 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8971 (Online)
Full text:
download
(downloads: 289)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Biology
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
574.587
DOI: 
10.18500/1816-9775-2019-19-4-440-452

Peculiarities of Spatial Distribution of the Bottom Fauna in the River Kan (Tributary of the Middle Yenisei, Krasnoyarsk Region)

Autors: 
Andrianova Anna V., Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Karepova Evgeniya D., Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Lepyavko Maxim P., Siberian Federal University
Abstract: 

In the rivers of the Yenisei basin, benthic invertebrates play a major role in feeding most valuable Siberian fish species. This report presents advanced material on zoobenthos of the river Kan (one of the major tributaries of the Yenisei in its middle course). Litho-psammo-rheophilic biocenosis of benthic invertebrates was the most developed, 99 species and forms were recorded there. The total number of zoobenthos was formed from mayflies, caddisflies and chironomids; biomass – from caddisflies and mayflies. Correlation analysis revealed a consistent variation in the numbers of structure-forming insect orders (mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies). The clustering of data on the number of families revealed consistency with the geographical zoning of the river Kan and the change of hydrological conditions. In the longitudinal profile of the river, there was a change of dominant families among the mayflies in Heptageniidae – Ephemerellidae – Ephemeridae; families of caddisflies – from Glossosomatidae to Hydropsychidae. The temperature of the water during the study period determined up to 30% of the variance in the number of stoneflies, dipterans, and the “other” group. For caddisflies, the influence of oxygen dissolved in water is more significant (20% of the explained dispersion). The studied area of the river Kan is a rithral zone, while the middle flow is characterized as a metarithral zone, and the lower flow is mixed with metarithral zone and hyper-rithral zone characteristics due to landscape-geomorphological features

Key words: 
rheophilic zoobenthos
taxonomic structure
spatial distribution
Oxygen
temperature
rithral zone
river Kan
Yenisei basin
Reference: 
  1. Khrennikov V., Baryshev I., Shustov Y., Pavlov V., Ilmast N. Zoobenthos of salmon rivers in the Kola Peninsula and Karelia (north east Fennoscandia). Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 2007, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–77.
  2. Gladyshev M. I., Moskvicheva A. V. Baikal invaders have become dominant in the Upper Yenisei benthofauna. Doklady Biological Sciences, 2002, vol. 383, no. 1–6, pp. 138–140.
  3. Gadinov A. N., Dolgih P. M. Spatial and species composition of ichthyocenosis; relative abundance and factors affecting fi sh distribution in the Yenisey River. The Bulletin of KrasGAU, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 169–174 (in Russian).
  4. Andrianova A. V. Dynamics of Yenisei zoobenthos evolution in the downstream of Krasnoyarsk Hydroelectric Power Station. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology, 2013, vol. 1, no. 21, pp. 74–88 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/21/6
  5. Ponomareva Y. A., Ivanova E. A. Ratio between living and dead cells and the size structure of the Yenisei River phytoplankton downstream of the Krasnoyarsk Hydroelectric Power Station. Contemporary Problems Ecology, 2016, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 582–589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S199542551605011
  6. Greze V. N. Kormovye resursy ryb reki Enisey i ikh ispol’zovanie [Feed resources of fi sh in the Yenisey River and their use]. Moscow, Pishchepromizdat Publ., 1957. 236 p. (in Russian).
  7. Zapekina-Dul’keyt Yu. I. Bottom fauna productivity of the Mana river and its change in connection with the timber rafting. Issues of studying the hydrofauna of the upper Yenisei water bodies. Krasnoyarsk, Kr. knizh. izdvo, 1972, vol. IX, pp. 5–106 (in Russian).
  8. Gadinov A. N. The structure of the zoobenthos of the lower reaches of the Yenisei River before and after the construction of the dam of the Krasnoyarsk Hydroelectric Power Station. Problems of use and protection of natural resources of Central Siberia, 2007, vol. 9, pp. 106–108 (in Russian).
  9. Zuev I. V., Semenova E. M., Shulepina S. P., Reznik K. A., Trofi mova E. A., Shadrin E. N., Zotina T. A. Feeding composition of grayling Thymallus sp. in the middle reach of the Yenisei River. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Biology, 2011, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 281–292 (in Russian).
  10. Zadelenov V. A., Shadrin E. N., Shchur L. A. The current state of the aquatic biological resources of the Irbeisky watercourses (the Agul River, the Kungus River). Problems of use and protection of natural resources of Central Siberia, 2004, vol. 6, pp. 48–57 (in Russian).
  11. Kalacheva G. S., Gladyshev M. I., Sushchik N. N., Dubovskaya O. P., Shulepina S. P., Ageev A. V. Production of polyunsaturated fatty acids by zoobenthos in rivers with contrasting temperatures. Doklady Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2013, vol. 453, no. 1, pp. 308–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1607672913060094
  12.  Guisan A., Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 2005, vol. 8, pp. 993–1009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x
  13. Zinchenko T. D., Shitikov V. K., Golovatyuk L. V. Spatial distribution features of bottom communities of a plain river in the Middle Volga river basin. Tomsk State University Journal of Biology, 2017, vol. 40, pp. 163–180 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/40/10
  14. Zadelyonov V. A. Harakteristika biocenozov malyh vodotokov Krasnoyarskogo kraya, ispol’zuemyh pri razrabotke rossypnyh mestorozhdenij zolota [Characteristics of biocenoses of small watercourses of the Krasnoyarsk region used in the development of placer gold deposits]. In: Sohranenie bioraznoobraziya Prienisejskoj Sibiri [Preservation of biodiversity of the Yeniseysk Siberia]. Krasnoyarsk, Izd-vo Krasnoyar. un-ta, 2000, pp. 93–94 (in Russian).
  15. Ezhegodnik kachestva poverhnostnyh vod i effektivnosti provedennyh vodoohrannyh meropriyatij po territorii deyatel’nosti FGBU «Srednesibirskoe UGMS» za 2013 god. [Yearbook of the surface water quality and the effectiveness of water protection measures taken in the territory of activity of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Central Siberian State Hydrometeorological Service” for 2013]. Krasnoyarsk, 2014, 121 p. (in Russian).
  16. Chebanova V. V. Bentos lososevykh rek Kamchatki [Benthos of Salmon Rivers of Kamchatka]. Moscow, VNIRO Publ., 2009, 172 p. (in Russian).
  17. Webster J. R. Spiraling down the river continuum: stream ecology and the U-shaped curve. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 2007, vol. 26, pp. 375–389.
  18. Masikini R., Kaaya L. T., Chicharo L. Evaluation of ecohydrological variables in relation to spatial and temporal variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages along the Zigi River – Tanzania. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 2018, vol. 2, pp. 130–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.03.004
  19. Scotti A., Jacobsen D., Tappeiner U., Bottarin R. Spatial and temporal variation of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages during the glacial melt season in an Italian glacier-fed stream. Hydrobiologia, 2019, vol. 827, pp. 123–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3731-8
  20. Demina I. V., Ermochin M. V., Polukonova N. V. Macrozoobenthos communities from fl oodplain lakes of the Volga River valley (Saratov Region). Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Chemistry. Biology. Ecology, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 84–96 (in Russian).
  21. Yanygina L. V. Aspects of spatial organisation of benthic communities in rivers of the Upper and Mid Ob. The World of Science, Culture and Education, 2013, vol. 3 (40), pp. 445–449 (in Russian).
  22. Hwang, Jeong Mi, Sung Jin Lee and Yeon Jae Bae. Two Co-inhabiting Burrowing Mayfl ies, Ephemera orientalis and E. sachalinensis, in Korean Streams (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). Korean J. Limnol., 2003, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 427–433.
  23. Illies J., Botosaneanu L. Problems et methods de la classifi cation et de la zonation ecologique des eaux courantes, considerees surtout du point de vue faunistique. Internationalen Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 1963, no. 12, pp. 1–57.
  24. Pan’kov N. N. Strukturnye i funkcional’nye harakteristiki zoobentocenozov r. Sylvy (bassejn Kamy) [Structural and functional characteristics of zoobenthocenoses of the ruver Sylva (Kama basin)]. Perm, Izd-vo Perm. gos. un-ta, 2004. 162 p. (in Russian).
  25. Koveshnikov M. I. Prostranstvennoe raspredelenie, sezonnaya dinamika zoobentosa i ocenka ekologicheskogo sostoyaniya vodnyh ob”ektov bassejna reki Biya [Spatial distribution, seasonal dynamics of zoobenthos and assessment of the ecological status of water bodies of the River Biya basin]. Tesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Biol.). Barnaul, 2009. 24 p. (in Russian).
  26. Chertoprud M. V., Palatov D. M. Rheophilic communities of macrobenthos of the southwestern Kola peninsula. Inland Water Biology, 2013, vol. 4, pp. 305–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082913040056
  27. Khamenkova E. V., Teslenko V. A., Tiunova T. M. Distribution of the macrobenthos fauna in the Ola River basin, northern coast of the Sea of Okhotsk. Entomological Review, 2017, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 344–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873817030071