Izvestiya of Saratov University.

Chemistry. Biology. Ecology

ISSN 1816-9775 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8971 (Online)


For citation:

Brailova I. S., Yurieva N. I., Belousova Y. V., Belyaeva E. P. The study of heterogeneity and the specificity of prolamins of the varieties of winter wheat and their connection with economic values. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Chemistry. Biology. Ecology, 2025, vol. 25, iss. 3, pp. 318-328. DOI: 10.18500/1816-9775-2025-25-3-318-328, EDN: LTYWLP

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 38)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
631.523:633.11
EDN: 
LTYWLP

The study of heterogeneity and the specificity of prolamins of the varieties of winter wheat and their connection with economic values

Autors: 
Brailova Irina S., Voronezh Federal Agrarian Research Center named after V. V. Dokuchaev
Yurieva Natalya I., Voronezh Federal Agrarian Research Center named after V. V. Dokuchaev
Belousova Yulia V., Voronezh Federal Agrarian Research Center named after V. V. Dokuchaev
Abstract: 

Based on the Voronezh ANC named after V. V. Dokuchaev of the Department of Genetics and Immunity, electrophoretic studies were conducted, based on detailed study and analysis of polymorphism of prolamins of 5 varieties of winter wheat and their conjugation with economic and valuable features. Studies were conducted in 2022–2024 in the conditions of the southeast of the Central Black Earth Region. In the process, gliadin biotypes were identifi ed by electrophoresis in 6.5% polyacrylamide gel. On the basis of each variety of reference spectra, containing all possible components of this protein, it was found that in the structure of the genome of the studied varieties there is: black soot 115 – 2 biotype, black soot 130 – 2 biotype, basalt 2 – 3 biotype, sickening – 2 bio -biotype (Polymorphic varieties), dish – 1 biotype (monomorphic variety). The dedicated biotypes for 3 years have been propagated, analyzed and evaluated by the indicators of the structural analysis of the main elements of productivity, quality and resistance to adverse environmental factors. Based on this, their economic and biological characteristics were given. The analysis of the data showed that the most valuable in the elements of productivity distinguished: the second biotype of the Black – School 115 varieties, the second biotic Black – eating variety 130, the fi rst and third biotypes of the Basalt 2 variety, the fi rst and second biotypes of the variety sorted. According to quality indicators, the selected biotypes were at the standard level. Over all the years of research on stability to brown leaf rust, all the biotype packs studied have shown themselves as moderately resistant and moderate. The most stable stability over the entire period of the study to the solid head showed the second biotype of the variety of sorting, it belongs to the group of poorly permissible. The best biotypes can be selected as donors of economic and valuable features, and in breeding programs when selecting parental forms for hybridization, taking into account their phenotypic features.

Reference: 
  1. Созинов A. A. Принципиально новые подходы к созданию сортов и сохранению биологического разнообразия // Молекулярно-генетические маркеры и селекция растений : материалы конф. (Киев, 1–13 мая 1994 г.). М. : Аграрная наука, 1994. С. 5–9.
  2. Копусь М. М., Игнатьева Н. Г., Дорохова Д. П., Кравченко Н. С., Сарычева Н. И. Биотипный состав и чистосортность сортов озимой мягкой пшеницы по проламинам зерна // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2015. Т. 29, № 11. С. 52–54.
  3. Конарев В. Г., Сидорова В. В., Конарев А. В. Молекулярно-биологические исследования генофонда культурных растений в ВИРе (1967–2007 гг.) / изд. 2-е доп. СПб. : ВИР, 2007. 134 с.
  4. Алпатьева Н. В., Губарева Н. К. Анализ биотипного состава староместных сортов мягкой пшеницы из коллекции ВИР в процессе хранения и репродукции // Аграрная Россия. 2002. № 3. С. 28–31.
  5. Новосельская-Драгович А. Ю., Беспалова Л. А., Шишкина А. А. Изучение генетического разнообразия сортов мягкой озимой пшеницы по глиадинкодирующим локусам // Генетика. 2015. Т. 51, № 3. С. 324–333.
  6. Методика государственного испытания сельскохозяйственных культур. Вып. 2. Зерновые, крупяные, зернобобовые, кукуруза и кормовые культуры. М. : Госагропром СССР, 1989. 194 с.
  7. Воронкова А. А. Генетико-иммунологические основы селекции пшеницы на устойчивость к ржавчине. (Науч. тр. ВАСХНИЛ). М. : Колос, 1980. 192 с.
  8. Mains E. B., Jackson A. C. Physiological specializations in the cereal rust of wheat Puccinia triticina Erikss // Phytopathol. 1926. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 89–120.
  9. Peterson R. F., Campbell A. B., Hannah A. E. Diagrammatic skala for estimating rust infencity on leaves and stems of cereals // Canad. J. Res. 1948. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 496–500.
  10. Доспехов Б. А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований). 5-е изд., доп. и перераб. М. : Агропромиздат, 1985. 351 с.
Received: 
06.02.2025
Accepted: 
28.04.2025
Published: 
30.09.2025
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 35)